"[Kagan's] thesis written from the perspective of an anti-communist scholar who was not in sync with the pro-communist leftism of what by then was a declining New Left does not reveal that she was an advocate of radical social change. It does reveal an individual who, like the socialists and unionists she was writing about, also wanted to “change America.” It is clear that she found their struggles inspirational and that she empathized with their fight. If she has not changed her views on these issues, it puts her right in the mainstream of what is today’s left-of -center Democratic Party ... Some may disagree with the political sympathies that led her to write on this topic, but I believe the thesis itself should serve as no grounds to deny her appointment to the Supreme Court,"- Ron Radosh, Pajamas Media.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to letters@theatlantic.com.