Serwer adds more context:

[I]t's not the military's job to make troop decisions, it's the president's job. But because the military is popular and trusted while politicians are not, there's a political incentive for politicians to use the military against their political opponents. That further erodes trust in civilian leadership while entrenching the notion that the president's job is to rubber-stamp the decisions made by his military advisers.

The thing is, politicians aren't the only ones who worry about their image. To the extent that there's been a "canonization" of Petraeus I'd argue the media is more responsible than Petraeus himself. The incentives to find a central hero in a sprawling narrative of war, the media's own desire to align itself with a popular figure in a time of conflict, and the general trend towards shoehorning complex events into simple stories all contributed to the current circumstances.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to