[N]owhere in the article does the term “gay” or “homosexual” appear. This article conceives of men, maleness, and “the New Macho” as an entirely heterosexual thing. That, too, is wildly irresponsible.
Tracy Clark-Flory lobbed a different criticism:
Their argument is essentially that we need to encourage men to take active caretaking roles at home and at work. This means putting more emphasis on the importance of fatherhood and recasting so-called nurturing professions so that they no longer seem the sole domain of women. Another way of saying all that? Men need feminism.
Jezebel's Anna North weighed in:
We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to email@example.com.