by Chris Bodenner

Brian Leubitz shrugs his shoulders at the "gay-friendly governator"'s expected signing of a bill that would remove a 60-year-old state policy of "curing" homosexuals:

It is great that Arnold has been on our side in the last few years. But, he has never been willing to put any of his own political capital on the line. Instead, he’s content to wait it out. He vetoed the Harvey Milk Day bill before signing it. And with Mark Leno’s marriage bills, he ran for the hills. His rationale was that somebody, the judges, the people, anybody but him, should say something first. Regardless of whether he thought Prop 22 was unconstitutional back in 2005 or not, he was not willing to take the lead by just signing the bill. If marriage inequality was odious to the constitution 6 months ago, it was odious in 2005 as well. Would it have stirred up some controversy? Most definitely. But real leaders have a tendency to do that.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to letters@theatlantic.com.