A reader writes:

Your reader comparing Beloit and San Antonio is leaving one major component out of the comparison: military spending. San Antonio is home to four large bases (Brooks, Sam Houston, Lackland, and Randolph) while Beloit has... a National Guard armory.

Another writes

Texas years ago enacted strict laws governing exotic and aggressive mortgages (e.g. no IO loans, no 10% down, maybe no liar loans either). As a result, there was no housing-price boom and subsequent bust in Texas. If it were simply the immigrant reason assumed by your reader, California would hardly be bankrupt.

Another:

I, too, am a college student from Texas who attends school out of state, and I can corroborate your reader's story. I go to school in Los Angeles, where the recession seems to be absolutely crippling the city. Traffic has almost disappeared and a ton of homes near USC are in foreclosure. Right before heading home for the summer, I drove by a line that stretched for a block and a half. Those people were waiting for hours outside to interview for a single job at a restaurant as a waiter.

By contrast, I came home this summer to San Angelo, TX, where nobody acts like a recession is happening. Construction on new houses is still ongoing at roughly the same pace it has been for the past 5 years. In fact, all of West Texas has been left relatively untouched by the recession. Lubbock, for example, has 2% unemployment. Even Houston, Dallas, and Austin haven't been hit nearly as hard as the rest of the nation.

My theory is that the Texas economy - primarily based on energy and agriculture - is fundamentally different than other states. Thus, the economy in the Lone Star State is, at its core, mainly responsive to rainfall and commodity prices.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to letters@theatlantic.com.