by Chris Bodenner
I don’t and didn’t mean to make moral judgments about sexual non-monogamy. If I were making moral judgments, they would be about honesty, trust or lack thereof, abusiveness of various kinds, etc. I ended my comments with “More power to them,” which Dan Savage seems to have missed or chosen to ignore. It wasn’t meant sarcastically.
One point I was trying to make, and perhaps didn’t make very well, was that sexual monogamy is something of a red herring. Other readers who wrote in with stories of making non-monogamy work -- whether in practice or, so far, just in theory -- included what I came to think is the crucial element: what I call monogamy of decision-making. For me, sexual non-monogamy was the apparent problem, but it was lack of clarity and consensus about what the relationships really were that was the real problem.
I don’t suppose Dan Savage has any intentions of shutting up; why should I? In my earlier years, it was the non-monogamists who wouldn’t shut up about how superior open relationships were. I could spend the rest of my life talking about this without redressing the balance.
We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to firstname.lastname@example.org.