David Jarman criticizes National Journal's rankings of politicians:

[W]hen Kucinich votes against healthcare reform for not being single-payer, it’s notched as a conservative vote rather than a lefty one. And when Paul votes against military adventurism, it’s recorded as a liberal vote rather than modern-day isolationism. In other words, because they break with their party on principle, National Journal ends up classifying ideologues as centrists.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to letters@theatlantic.com.