A reader writes:

I don't know Breitbart well enough to comment on him personally, but anytime I read about a man who 1) has not dealt with death, and his own fear of death, 2) violently suppresses his emotions, beginning with his deep grief ("I've created a horrific buttress of protections"), and then 3) apparently specializes in a war of rage against those "others" he considers "wrong", I can't help but suspect a case of arrested development, fueled by fear, marked by displacement and projection, and perpetuated by the inability or unwillingness to face himself. I might have every sympathy for the guy -- in fact, even the short quotes you featured were moving -- but I have to ask, why do we all have to suffer his rage while this man works his neurosis out publicly? As Rumi said:

"You're crazy and numb.
You're drinking our blood,
and have no experience
of the nearness."

Don't we have enough of this everywhere we turn now?

We have a world in serious trouble, and a country that's become almost ungovernable. We need people now who are constructive, not destructive: sane adults who are fueled by a sense of responsibility, by courage and by love, not adolescents looking for the nest excuse to throw a neurotic tantrum. Rage can be very satisfying -- temporarily. But what gets "satisfied"? The whole man or woman, the adult? Or the fearful, angry child? Or the neurosis itself?

As I understand it, Breitbart is a "conservative"; whatever that now means, I've always understood conservatives associate it, above all, with taking responsibility for yourself, with being accountable. It might do Breitbart (and all the rest of us) a world of good if he'd put aside his rage and his war against the 'other' until he's dealt with his own issues. Then he might have something to say -- something real, something worth listening to.

This note was hardly worth writing -- especially, as I say, since I don't know Breitbart well -- except that our entire political discourse, national and international, now seems swamped by this kind of displaced fear and rage. We need to get a grip.

We need to start calling out those -- left, right or middle -- who are 'crazy and numb', and make their living (and perpetuate their 'horrific buttresses of self-protection') by 'drinking our blood'. We do not have to live lives, and govern a world, based on the mental illnesses of the most angry, the most fearful, the most self-absorbed. There are alternatives -- and we'd better start finding them, or we will all pay the price. The 'satisfaction' of rage is not free.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to letters@theatlantic.com.