by Patrick Appel

Will at Ordinary Gentleman makes a solid point on behalf of cap and trade opponents:

Straightforward denialism allows those who favor aggressive emissions controls to shape the public’s perception of climate science. Instead of sober cost-benefit analysis, people who basically accept the existence of global warming (read: most of the voting public) are now more likely to think that climate change is catastrophic rather than incremental. The longer the right’s response to anthropogenic warming is dominated by the likes of Inhofe and Santorum, the longer this perception will linger, which doesn’t bode well for efforts to stop monstrously expensive cap-and-trade legislation.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to letters@theatlantic.com.