The New York Review of Books mostly defends blogging and praises the Dish (among others):

[A]s a regular reading of [Sullivan's] posts shows, his multiple links to a wide array of sources, processed through his idiosyncratic gay-Catholic-Thatcherite- turned-libertarian-radical mind, produces an engaging and original take on the world. A dramatic demonstration of this occurred just after the Iranian elections, when his site became an up-to-the-minute clearinghouse for e-mails, Twitter feeds, YouTube videos, photos, and e-mails from Tehran, many posted before mainstream news outlets could get hold of them. Sullivan made no pretense of being balanced he devoutly desired the overthrow of the hard-line establishment supporting Ahmadinejad and tilted his site to that endbut at a time when Western journalists were largely muzzled, The Daily Dish served as a nerve center for news from the Iranian street. While reading his site, I was also watching CNN, and it seemed clear that Sullivan, sitting at his computer, outperformed CNN's entire global network.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to letters@theatlantic.com.