Dave Roberts, amazed that the Cap & Trade vs. Carbon Tax debate is still raging, sticks himself in the center of it:

In the short-term, complementary policies will spur the most action. The never-ending, chin-stroking carbon pricing debate perpetually overlooks this basic fact. (See: “Cap and Trade is Not Enough: Improving US Climate Policy” [PDF] from Carnegie Mellon.) What’s going to knock us off the status quo path in the next decade is, above all, new targets and standards for energy efficiency. Also: a renewable energy standard, a low-carbon fuel standard, smart-grid standards and funding, government procurement policies, direct government investment, etc. etc. These are the policies that could get things rolling immediately. And guess what?

The Waxman-Markey bill contains those complementary policies. Also, it exists.

Both these characteristics set it apart from the Alternative Universe Carbon Tax Pony Bill. Carbon taxers seem blinded by a misguided obsession with the specific mechanics of carbon pricing. By bashing Waxman-Markey, they are aligning themselves with people who want to block the best opportunity for climate/energy action in a generation. They’re aligning themselves with people who want to block it not in favor of a pony alternative, but in favor of doing nothing, to protect corporate donors. In many cases, they are adopting the exact same rhetoric as conservative obstructionists.

Whenever your opponents in a policy argument start citing the enemies you're allegedly aiding, you know you're onto something. But it's almost certainly quixotic. One of the results of the implosion of conservatism as a governing philosophy is that these arguments are now conducted largely within the liberal camp, where the primacy of the desired result always wins out.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to letters@theatlantic.com.