Richard Just makes an astute point:

[Maine Gov. Baldacci] shifted his view [on marriage] because he decided that the status quo wasn't constitutional. This struck me as a noteworthy, and unusually clear, piece of evidence in the debate over the efficacy of judicial activism. ... What Baldacci's comment suggests is that, as judges across the country reinterpret equal protection clauses in light of our culture's changing understanding of homosexuality, they are not merely persuading themselves or their peers in other courts; they are also persuading those outside the judicial system.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to letters@theatlantic.com.