John Cole has some questions for Dreher:
What on earth is [Dreher] talking about in regards to an additional amendment protecting religious institutions? Isn’t the 1st amendment still operative? Does he mean things like the “institution of marriage” and not religious institutions like the church itself? And if the SCOTUS makes gay marriage constitutional, what would an amendment do anyway?
And I am not trying to be snarky, but what is he talking about? Am I just not understanding the new codespeak for the religious right?
My own new response to Rod, "Vermont and Rod's Giant Sigh," is here.