It's a chilling Weimar-style editorial. The editors describe waterboarding, a torture technique long recognized as such by every legal authority, domestic and international, thus:
the practice of making someone fearful he is about to drown in an effort to induce him to cooperate with interrogator.
They define what they believe is now allowed:
[techniques] that don't involve maiming, mutilation and other legitimate torture...
The Times continues to argue that Geneva's Common Article 3 does not apply to prisoners the president doesn't want it to apply to. But the baseline standards for humane treatment - not POW status, but core human status - apply to all.
We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to email@example.com.