by Patrick Appel
Steven Waldman sounds deflated:
I think the real significance -- and the reason pro-life Obama supporters ought to be disappointed -- is the combination of the gag rule repeal (which was expected) and the language he used in his Roe v. Wade statement [two days ago].
He did mention the goal of reducing unintended pregnancies. But keep in mind that pro-life Obama supporters believed that their big victory during the fights over the Democratic Party platform was not the language about reducing unintended pregnancies -- but rather the language about helping women carry babies to term, if that was their choice.
That thought was absent from yesterday's statement.
On the other side of the issue, Feministe blogger Cara celebrates.
We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to firstname.lastname@example.org.