Hilzoy delves into Palin's answer on the Bush doctrine:
When, as Palin said, "there is legitimate and enough intelligence that tells us that a strike is imminent against American people", the claim that we have the right to preempt that strike does not require the Bush Doctrine; it just requires the old, and much more widely accepted, doctrine of preemption. That is: in what Palin says here, she's not actually supporting the Bush Doctrine at all. She's just saying what generations of American Presidents and candidates have said: that when a country is actually about to attack us, we don't have to wait for them to actually land a blow before we can strike back.
Palin opposes the Bush Doctrine and opposed the surge! The absurdity of her candidacy is beginning to become clearer and clearer.
We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to firstname.lastname@example.org.