Ross wonders why Todd Purdum's article on Bill Clinton is only coming out now:

...if you'd asked me nine months ago to list the major roadblocks to Hillary's near-inevitable nomination, I would have put her husband's possible tomcatting right up there with her Iraq War vote. In the event, the Big He did end up having an impact on the race, but it was public gaffes that mattered, not his private vices. I'm not sure what to make of the lack of coverage on this front: It could suggest that there's vastly more smoke than fire where Clinton's post-Presidential priapism is concerned; it could suggest that Clinton's handlers are really, really good at putting out the fires in question (though it doesn't sound that way from Purdum's piece); or it could suggest a conspiracy of silence on the part of the media, based on a fear of pulling the trigger on stories that could get them accused of gossip-mongering or invading the Clintons' privacy.

The latter, Ross, the latter.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to