Not sure what difference it makes, but their argument is solid enough:

In the language of metaphor, Clinton is an essay, solid and reasoned; Obama is a poem, lyric and filled with possibility. Clinton would be a valuable and competent executive, but Obama matches her in substance and adds something that the nation has been missing far too long -- a sense of aspiration.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to letters@theatlantic.com.