This is the explanation:

"When she's the general-election nominee, she'll release the tax returns."

But that's not an explanation. I really can't see why this lack of transparency isn't a bigger deal. On what grounds is it legit to withhold critical information until the primaries are over? Especially when the vagaries of the Clintons' rapidly growing - and partly meshed - fortune is a serious campaign issue. Especially when a candidate has borrowed from herself to float her campaign. Shouldn't this be asked tonight? Shouldn't the press insist on getting the returns?

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to letters@theatlantic.com.