Now, the questions will start and investigative reporters have a job to do. A reader writes:
Whatever you think about candidates' self-funding, this has always been done with funds generated in a business career (Romney), or through marriage/inheritance. The Clintons' case is so different -- their wealth is derived in large part from those seeking access and proximity to power, and they know that whatever the outcome of this race, she will still be a Senator and he will still be an ex-President, so the sale can go on.
It is not comparable to the Romney situation, and it's kinda sleazy, and certainly unprecedented.
Kinda sleazy? The Clintons?