Now, the questions will start and investigative reporters have a job to do. A reader writes:

Whatever you think about candidates' self-funding, this has always been done with funds generated in a  business career (Romney), or through marriage/inheritance. The Clintons' case is so different -- their wealth is derived in large part from those seeking access and proximity to power, and they know that whatever the outcome of this race, she will still be a Senator and he will still be an ex-President, so the sale can go on.

It is not comparable to the Romney situation, and it's kinda sleazy, and certainly unprecedented.

Kinda sleazy? The Clintons?

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to