What if the Republican president had hewed to the projected spending levels of his Democratic predecessor - you know, that flaming liberal, Bill Clinton? If you project the Clinton administration's 2001 plans for long-term spending and you allow for all the new defense spending in Iraq and Afghanistan and elsewhere, you still end up with a surplus. The difference is Republican recklessness.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to letters@theatlantic.com.