TCS comes through with an honest defense of Paul's account of the longterm question of blowback in the Middle East. George W. Bush has made the same "absurd" point (to quote Rudy the Waterboarder). Buchanan naturally liked what he heard. Here's another angry Paul-supporting conservative. John Dickerson, no conservative, makes the obvious case for keeping Paul in the debates. Michelle Malkin, who regularly lambastes the MSM for spreading lies, has not yet retracted her own on-air lie about Paul believing that Bush knew about 9/11 in advance. It's a useful test of her integrity. Is she an honest blogger or a lying propagandist? If she doesn't retract, she's telling us she's the latter.