There is a world in Nietzsche. And he foresaw the theocons. In the same work, he wrote about the attempt to reverse what has evolved in Western consciousness:

"Whispered to the conservatives. — What was not known formerly, what is known, or might be known, today: a reversion, a return in any sense or degree is simply not possible. We physiologists know that. Yet all priests and moralists have believed the opposite — they wanted to take mankind back, to screw it back, to a former measure of virtue. Morality was always a bed of Procrustes. Even the politicians have aped the preachers of virtue at this point: today too there are still parties whose dream it is that all things might walk backwards like crabs. But no one is free to be a crab. Nothing avails: one must go forward — step by step further into decadence (that is my definition of modern "progress"). One can check this development and thus dam up degeneration, gather it and make it more vehement and sudden: one can do no more."

And which of these options best describe Richard John Neuhaus? One suspects the latter.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to letters@theatlantic.com.