The news day may be slow, but that won't stop the media from taking a long, hard look in the mirror. Or at whatever other ephemera grabs their eyes. Here are today's best navel-gazing tweets (and a few other gems):
The Los Angeles Time's Andrew Malcom sees Tony Hayward going the way of Lebron:
Letterman: So Tony Hayward is leaving BP. He'll be announcing his future plans soon on a one-hour ESPN special. Latimes.com/ticket
Patrick W. Gavin writes an open plea asking Slate to redeploy some of the magic from its popular mock Obama facebook page:
Dear Slate: Once you're done with Obama's Facebook feed, please work on Congress' Mint account.
Delrayser wonders (as does the world) why Politico missed this must-read story:
Matt Yglesias knows well—all too well?—the dastardly deeds of Journolist:
Full JournoList archives not yet posted on WikiLeaks: Conspiracy?
Marc Ambinder wrestles with the first existential question of election 2012:
Pawlenty wants to be the Un-Romney. Serious question: what does that mean? And what's T-Paw's distinguishing characteristic?
West Wing Report, we doubt that Obama's detractors would like either option listed:
WWR wonders...if folks think Obama's doing such a bad job, shouldn't they be glad he's golfing and not in the Oval Office?
Slate's John Dickerson follows in the footsteps of Cavaliers' owner Dan Gilbert:
Sometimes when his wife is out of town, and after everyone has gone from the office, he shuts his door and types to himself in Comic Sans.
Paul Kedrosky relishes a certain 21st-century brand of teenage vandalism:
I find bouncing emails with Apple Mail childishly satisfying, like throwing rocks at an abandoned warehouse's windows.
Matt Lewis on WikiLeaks' fatal flaw:
How come WikiLeaks never reveals any of China's secret military operations??
Erick Erickson homes in on why John Thune would have been a good fit for the West Wing:
Let's be honest: if John Thune didn't look the part of President from typecasting, no one would be interested in him.
And finally, Chuck Klosterman signs off with a very Klostermanian tweet:
The first person who offers a criticism usually has a point. The second person is usually unnecessary. The third person is usually insane.
This article is from the archive of our partner The Wire.
We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to firstname.lastname@example.org.