After more than two tense, aggravating weeks, the federal government shutdown in the United States has ended. For Americans, who have watched the charade in Washington with a mixture of anger and bewilderment, the end of the shutdown brings relief: furloughed workers are back to work (with back pay), important government services have been restored, and national parks have re-opened. Most importantly, Congress has agreed to raise the debt ceiling, which means that the U.S. won't default on its payments ... until the limit is reached again in February.
The agreement has also calmed nerves in China, where Communist Party officials spent the last week of the crisis fretting about the children running the U.S. government. On Monday, Xinhua published an editorial (in its English edition only) calling an end to the “pernicious impasse” in Congress and proposing a “de-Americanized world.” Elsewhere, China's Vice Finance Minister, Zhu Guangyao, warned that “safeguarding the debt is of vital importance to the economy of the U.S. and the world” and even went so far as blaming the Tea Party for the mess. This prompted a complaint from the much-mocked Florida representative Ted Yoho, who remarked that Zhu's words “almost sound like a threat.”
The explanation for China's frayed nerves is pretty simple: Beijing owns $1.28 trillion in U.S. Treasury bills, a figure higher than any other country in the world. The devaluation of the U.S. dollar would reduce the value of China's holdings and make it more difficult for Americans to purchase Chinese imports, which is a key component of the country's growth model.
Put another way, China doesn't buy U.S. Treasury Bills because it wants to—it does because it has to. Patrick Chovanec, chief strategist at Silvercrest Asset Management and an expert on the Chinese economy, put it to me this way: “Imagine that the Chinese economy is a store where the U.S. economy buys products and pays for them with IOUs. The Chinese economy can either keep extending credits to the U.S. to pay for goods, or go out of business. That's the dilemma.”
This mutually-assured destruction isn't all bad; for one thing, it goes against the common assumption that the Sino-American relationship is necessarily zero-sum. But there are also signs that the current arrangement is not sustainable. According to Arthur Kroeber, the Managing Director of GaveKal Dragonomics, a Beijing-based economics research firm, Beijing's total possession of U.S. foreign reserves has remained static over the last two years, and China is now relying less on foreign trade than before. In addition, Chinese politicians may feel domestic pressure to move away from U.S. holdings in light of the embarrassing spectacle in Washington.
Yet there's little sign that the economic interdependence that underpins the Sino-American relationship is going anywhere. Following Zhu Guangyao's criticism of the “attitude of the Tea Party,” Congressman Blake Farenthold (R-Texas) retorted that the Chinese “need to stay out of our politics.” But given how much is at stake for China, though, you could argue that it's their politics, too.