Pumpkins: An American Obsession

Americans’ obsession with a certain fleshy, orange-colored vegetable has created handsome profits for farmers, canners, and sellers, and in the past decade, the pumpkin industry has flourished. From 2001 to 2014, pumpkin production nearly doubled in value, from $75 million to $143 million, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Last year was not so great for the industry, as diseases and excessive rain in the midwest damaged crop yield and production fell to $90 million. But even then, the nation still produced more pounds of pumpkin than other popular vegetables like spinach, garlic, cucumbers, and squash.

There are two types of pumpkins that have become the biggest moneymakers. The ornamental pumpkins, also called Halloween pumpkins, are the most visible. They are round, bright orange, and smooth, and are typically carved for Halloween or used as decorations. The second type is called a processing pumpkin, which is beige-ish on the outside, oblong, and flavorful. These normally end up in processing plants, where the pumpkin flesh is canned and shipped to supermarkets, which sell it for pie-making and other pumpkin-related cooking.

When Americans buy pumpkins (canned or whole) from a store, chances are they come from Illinois. The state led the country last year with an estimated 318 million pounds of pumpkin produced, followed by California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and New York. There are two reasons why Illinois has become the pumpkin capital of the United States, says Mohammad Babadoost, a crop scientist at the University of Illinois who spends much of his time researching diseases that attack the beloved orange crop. One reason Illinois has become the heart of the pumpkin industry, he says, is that the soil and climate there are ideal for growing beautiful pumpkins. The other reason is that in the early 1900s, pumpkin-processing plants opened up in the Morton, Illinois area, establishing a geographical center for the pumpkin industry. “[The industry] has been growing ever since—there is so much enthusiasm,” says Babadoost, who estimates that 90 percent of canned pumpkins sold in the United States come from Illinois. “People want pumpkin for bread, pie, wine, ice cream, recreational purposes.”

Recreational purposes? He’s referring to the growing popularity of pumpkin patches and farms, which in Illinois alone attract thousands of visitors, many from nearby cities like Chicago. Pumpkin farms across the country have created lucrative agritourism businesses, and when someone visits one of these farms, it only fuels their love of pumpkins, Babadoost says.

Maybe Americans have an inborn passion for pumpkins. Though it’s not clear where the vegetable originated, pumpkin seeds found in present-day Mexico date back to more than 7,000 years ago. Pumpkins were integral to the Aztec and Mayan diets, and were also a staple of the diets of Native Americans, who roasted pumpkins over the fire but also used the vegetable for medicinal purposes and weaved mats out of its fibers. Pumpkins are also credited with keeping New England settlers alive when they failed at growing wheat and corn. One of the first American folk songs, “New England’s Annoyances,” memorialized the pumpkin with these lyrics: “Our pumpkins and parsnips are common supplies: We have pumpkins at morning and pumpkins at noon; If it was not for pumpkins we should be undone.”

Centuries later, Irish immigrants would start a new pumpkin tradition: carving jack-o-lanterns. In Europe, they used turnips or potatoes to celebrate their version of Halloween, but after arriving in the United States, they discovered it was much easier to carve pumpkins.

In light of all this history, the obsession with pumpkins seems to make sense. Luckily, Americans won’t be “undone” by a lack of pumpkins these days, but they have managed to put them toward another American tradition: the creation of a new, profitable industry.

About the Author

Alexia Fernández Campbell is a former staff writer at The Atlantic, where she covers immigration and business. She was previously a reporter at the South Florida Sun-Sentinel and the Spanish-language newspaper of The Palm Beach Post.

More comfortable online than out partying, post-Millennials are safer, physically, than adolescents have ever been. But they’re on the brink of a mental-health crisis.

One day last summer, around noon, I called Athena, a 13-year-old who lives in Houston, Texas. She answered her phone—she’s had an iPhone since she was 11—sounding as if she’d just woken up. We chatted about her favorite songs and TV shows, and I asked her what she likes to do with her friends. “We go to the mall,” she said. “Do your parents drop you off?,” I asked, recalling my own middle-school days, in the 1980s, when I’d enjoy a few parent-free hours shopping with my friends. “No—I go with my family,” she replied. “We’ll go with my mom and brothers and walk a little behind them. I just have to tell my mom where we’re going. I have to check in every hour or every 30 minutes.”

Those mall trips are infrequent—about once a month. More often, Athena and her friends spend time together on their phones, unchaperoned. Unlike the teens of my generation, who might have spent an evening tying up the family landline with gossip, they talk on Snapchat, the smartphone app that allows users to send pictures and videos that quickly disappear. They make sure to keep up their Snapstreaks, which show how many days in a row they have Snapchatted with each other. Sometimes they save screenshots of particularly ridiculous pictures of friends. “It’s good blackmail,” Athena said. (Because she’s a minor, I’m not using her real name.) She told me she’d spent most of the summer hanging out alone in her room with her phone. That’s just the way her generation is, she said. “We didn’t have a choice to know any life without iPads or iPhones. I think we like our phones more than we like actual people.”