With Apple, it's easy to focus on the relative bad news. The stock is in a slump (although the company is still enormous). Cupertino hasn't created a "new" product category in years (although its existing products are sensational). The world's leading market-maker for consumer technology looks more like a defensive tweaker (although the tweaks are often inspired).
But this weekend should alleviate any doubts about the company's popularity. Apple sold 9 million new phones in three days, 80 percent more than last year's then-record-breaking sales of the iPhone 5. Apple's two new models -- the fancy new 5S and the cheaper, colorful 5c -- tag-teamed for the biggest launch in company history. The indispensable Horace Dediu has the graph, breaking down each Apple and Samsung launch into units-sold-per-day to allow for better comparison:
Last week's launch was most celebrated for the cheaper, colorful iPhones, but "analysts and supply-chain watchers are saying the [higher-margin] 5S won the weekend far and away," Sam Grobart reports.
That's not so surprising. Apple has been keeping old, cheaper versions of its phones on the market for many years alongside new models, and the new models have always outsold the old. Apple devotees aren't buying iPhones to save money. They just want the world's best phone, and they think Apple makes it.
The company's problem, then, is about rates, not levels. Apple sells an absurd number of smartphones, but its growth has slowed as the market has saturated ...
The data shows that the 3GS was 3x more rapidly purchased on launch than the original iPhone. The 4S was 4x more rapidly purchased on launch than the 3GS and now the latest 5s/c are 2.3x more rapidly purchased than the 4S.
Bigger base. Lower growth. It's basically the company's conundrum in a nutshell. Apple can stay high-margin -- by selling more gold-plated phones. Apple can become super-high-growth -- by volume, at least, by offering cheaper products affordable at the Chindia price. It probably can't be both.
We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to firstname.lastname@example.org.