The Dark Side of Facebook's Triumphant Day

How do you build a $100 billion business serving ads on a three-inch screen?

Reuters

Facebook, Inc. just had the best day of its young life.

The stock surged 20 percent in morning trading after Mark Zuckerberg announced third quarter earnings. Mobile advertising -- the elusive golden snitch of the social media biz -- increased infinity percent (that's a real statistic!) from $0.00 a few months ago to $153 million in the last quarter. For perspective: Facebook is now on pace to make more than $1 billion in the next year from a business that didn't exist in 2011.

All of this is good news for Facebook's investors, who can finally catch their breath, and good news for Facebook's leadership, who can finally stop fielding questions about whether the company is too quixotic to build a real business. But there's a dark lining to Facebook's mobile triumph.

The company is transitioning to a business, mobile advertising, that just isn't very good, yet.

MOBILE PENNIES

Just last week, Google announced that mobile clicks were dragging down the average value of their ads. This was a harsh reality check. On a desktop, clicking a Google ad is worth $1. On a phone, it's worth $0.50. The more users move from desktops to phones, the cheaper the clicks.

It's the same story for Facebook. Desktop advertisements are worth more than mobile advertisements to Zuckerberg. So why are analysts celebrating a day when Facebook's desktop advertising revenue went down? Well, Facebook's audience is going mobile and the only way for Facebook to make money today is to put advertisements in front of eyeballs. So the company has no choice but to chase its customers onto small screens.

But how do you build a $100 billion business serving ads on a three-inch screen? This is the most important question facing Facebook today. The strategy now is to pick the low-hanging fruit: Slip subtle sponsored ads (or "stories") into mobile users' feeds. But there are two obvious problems with it.

First, go back two paragraphs: Sponsored ads on phone screens are worth less than sponsored ads on laptop screens. If more companies shift ad dollars from computers to phones -- "trading desktop dollars for mobile pennies" or what have you -- Facebook will be stuck in a position where they're forced to cannibalize their best revenue platform. Second, look at your smart phone. See how small that screen is? It's really quite small. Good luck stuffing as many ads as investors want on a three-inch-diagonal screen without customers screaming that their News Feed looks like a classifeds section.

Facebook and Google face the same problem. They're trying to figure out how to make money in a mobile world where screens are too small for ads to be beautiful and customers are too reluctant to share information for ads to be actually useful. In the long run, anything can happen, and I'm not one to bet against the smartest engineers and executives in the world. But for now, in the early years of the smartphone revolution, the guys making mad money off mobile aren't in Mountain View or Palo Alto. They're in Cupertino.

About the Author

Derek Thompson is a senior editor at The Atlantic, where he writes about economics, labor markets, and the media. He is the author of the book Hit Makers.

Twitter

The Arizona Republican is betting his Senate seat on the political appeal of decency—but can that pay off in Trump’s America?

The constituents filing into the Mesa Convention Center one evening in mid-April for the Republican senator Jeff Flake’s town hall had a decidedly un-Republican look. Tattoos and political T-shirts abounded. Activists stood near the entrance distributing stickers, flyers, and other paraphernalia of the resistance and urging attendees to get loud. While chants of “No stupid wall!” and “Health care for all!” echoed through the auditorium, a young woman in a chicken costume wandered the perimeter, clucking and posing for selfies in an act of protest whose meaning remained mysterious to me even after I asked her about it (“Jeff Flake is George Dubya’s chicken,” she said).

Flake couldn’t see any of this from backstage, but he knew that a hostile crowd likely awaited him. The early months of the Trump presidency had inflamed the grassroots left, and Republican lawmakers across the country had lately found themselves standing awkwardly in rooms like this one while liberal voters berated them. Flake is up for reelection next year, and some of his campaign advisers—wanting to avoid the kind of contentious scene that might end up in an attack ad—had suggested that he skip public forums for a while, as many of his colleagues were doing. But he insisted on going ahead.