How to think like a designer: Don't just observe the world, but draw upon what you know, interpret what you find, and look for unmet needs
There's a wonderful New Yorker article titled "The Eureka Hunt" (PDF). It's the story of a firefighter named Wagner Dodge who survived an out-of-control fire in the Mann Gulch in Montana in 1949. Thirteen other smoke jumpers died in the fire, but Dodge was saved by a brilliant insight. Fleeing for his life, he suddenly stopped running and ignited the ground around him. He then lay down on the smoldering embers and inhaled the thin layer of oxygen clinging to the ground. The fire passed over him and, after several terrifying minutes, Dodge emerged from the ashes, virtually unscathed.
What sort of a crazy person stops running from a fire and starts another one? Well, if you know certain things about fire and oxygen—knowledge that may have taken years to acquire—it's not as nutty as it sounds. Dodge had been a firefighter for many years and knew that fire needs three things to exist: fuel, air, and heat. By getting rid of the grass (i.e. fuel) around him, he took his chances with the fast moving fire and was able to save himself.
At first glance, insights like this one may seem to come out of nowhere. But in hindsight they make perfect, logical sense. What happens is that we (sometimes unconsciously) recognize patterns that enable us to see things in a new way. Albert Einstein put it succinctly when he said insight "comes suddenly and in a rather intuitive way. But intuition is nothing but the outcome of earlier intellectual experience."
It's important to recognize that observations and insights are not the same thing. Observations are raw data, the gradual accumulation of information that you have consciously and carefully recorded—exactly the way you saw or heard it, with no interpretation. Insights are the sudden realizations in which you interpret the observations and discover patterns. Patterns reveal gaps between where people are and where they'd ideally like to be. And, especially in the case of design, rifts between the way something is now and the way it should be.
One classic example of a pattern revealing a gap is what's sometimes called "feature creep," the constant adding of more and more features to tech products that were already too complicated to begin with. The home video camera is a prime example. All most people really want from a camera is to record, zoom, and upload the video to their hard drive or YouTube. So, why are there so many extra buttons? Consumer electronics company Pure Digital recognized the gap between what people wanted and what they were being offered, and filled it with the Flip Ultra, a video camera that has an on/off switch, a zoom-in/zoom-out toggle, and a foldout USB adapter.
The big question is: how do you spot the gap?
Well, the first thing is to get comfortable with the belief that insights don't come from looking at the obvious. We all have a tendency to focus on the most obvious information first—the information that confirms our existing knowledge. But insights usually come from surprising sources, and, more often than not, they come from observations that were completely unexpected.
Back in 1992, residents of a small Welsh town called Merthyr Tydfil were participating in a clinical trial of a new angina drug. Unfortunately for the pharmaceutical company, the drug didn't do much for angina. But it did have a lot of side effects in men, including back pain, stomach trouble, and long-lasting erections. If everyone at Pfizer had stayed focused on finding an angina drug, it would have stopped the trials and dropped the drug. But, by shifting the focus from the obvious to the unexpected—from primary effects to side effects—it was able to come up with Viagra, one of the most successful drugs ever.
Or consider the mundane act of mopping a floor. On an assignment for Procter & Gamble, Boston-based consultancy Continuum went to work studying dirt, watching people clean, and cleaning floors themselves. As you'd expect, the obvious thing they observed was that people find mopping a disagreeable chore. However, they also made an unexpected observation—water doesn't remove dirt all that well.
They discovered a counterintuitive rift between expectation and result—between what people thought a mop was doing and what, in fact, it was doing. Instead of removing dirt, water tends to slop it around. Dry rags, on the other hand, thanks to electrostatic attraction, are far more effective at picking up dirt. Customers don't want mops that work better with water. They just want clean floors.
This insight exposed a gap: an opportunity for waterless cleaning products. The Swiffer brand, as it became known, was an instant hit for P&G, with first-year sales of $200 million. P&G now earns more than $500 million annually from waterless cleaning products.
Generating insights like this is really a pattern-recognition skill. In other words, you aren't just reporting what you observe as you observe it. Rather, based on everything you know and have experienced, you're making connections and interpreting the patterns you see. When you identify something unexpected, spend some time looking for additional observations that may suggest interrelated connections. Then, ask "Why is this a pattern?" and "Why is this unexpected?" and, ultimately, "Why is this meaningful?"
We want to hear what you think. Submit a letter to the editor or write to firstname.lastname@example.org.