This article is from the archive of our partner .

On the same day that Google launched an online bookstore, hedge-fund manager and major Borders shareholder Bill Ackman offered to finance a $960 million bid for Borders to acquire its much larger rival, Barnes & Noble, which has been up for sale since the summer. The news sent both companies' stock prices soaring.

But as e-books contend with physical books and foot traffic in brick-and-mortar bookstores gives way to e-commerce, can a merger bring salvation to these two large but embattled bookstore chains?

  • It's A Smart Move, argues Jim McTevia, a Michigan-based turnaround consultant, in an interview with Bloomberg. The merger would allow Borders to slash its number of stores and Barnes & Nobles to fend off one less competitor: "You have two troubled companies in a troubled industry in a country where the consumer is troubled. This is in the best interest for the future of both companies.”
  • The Merger's Promising, But It's Plagued With Problems, remarks The Wall Street Journal's Shira Ovide. Yes, "the combined company could shut down a bunch of lousy stores, still have the heft to strong-arm book publishers, and concentrate their combined might on growth areas like electronic books." But there are three significant obstacles: 1) Barnes & Noble is losing money and saddled with debt, and Borders is financially troubled as well; 2) Bill Ackman has a financial interest in goosing Borders's stock price; and 3) it's doubtful that Barnes & Noble founder Len Riggio will relinquish his influence over the business or sell his nearly 30% stake in the company at Ackman's proposed price per share, which is less than he paid for his shares by exercising stock options this summer.
  • And It Would Be A Drop In The Book Market Bucket, asserts Fortune's Dan Primack. Adding up Ackman's offer, Borders's market capitalization, and other factors like post-close synergies, Primack estimates that a merged Borders-Barnes & Noble would be worth a generous $2 billion. In contrast,
As of market open today, Amazon was valued at more than $79 billion. Or, put another way, around 40x the size of Borders and Barnes & Noble combined ... Under normal circumstances, a company's stock would fall on news of two other rivals merging. But Amazon actually has ticked up more than a point today. Guess that's because Amazon shareholders no longer consider Borders and Barnes & Noble to be serious competition... whether alone or together.
  • This Is Not A Serious Overture, declares Sarah Weinman at Daily Finance: "Even if it is, it would be difficult, and not economically feasible, for B&N to accept a bid from a company it has repeatedly said no to in the past. And as for Borders, if a merger was its plan for saving itself, expect B&N's rejection of the deal to accelerate its downward spiral--an end that, sadly for the publishing industry, is likely to come sooner rather than later." Weinman wouldn't be surprised if Borders's move motivates Barnes & Noble founder and chairman Leonard Riggio to make his own bid for Barnes & Noble with the help of private equity.
  • It's Unlikely To Happen, concludes Morningstar analyst Peter Wahlstrom: "We believe the report is actually more of a statement that Barnes & Noble has been doing a better job of developing and implementing its long-term strategy--particularly on the digital front--and Borders could be looking to buy what it can't quickly develop on its own."

This article is from the archive of our partner The Wire.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to letters@theatlantic.com.