This graph is the product of Esquire Magazine's Commission to Balance the Federal Budget. The mag convened a three-day power-brainstorm with MSNBC host Lawrence O'Donnell and four former senators -- two Democrats, two Republicans -- to close a projected $700 billion deficit in 2020.
The group succeeded in finding $600 billion in spending cuts in 2020 without raising tax rates. They dramatically reformed Social Security, eliminated some major tax deductions, and increased the gas tax by $1. Most significantly, they reconfigured military spending to cut the Defense budget by 40 percent in 2020.
When you focus on the big numbers, the Esquire commission reduced spending by 3 percent of GDP almost entirely on the back of Social Security and Defense cuts: $86 billion from Social Security, $170 billion from military revamping, and $130 billion from wrapping up the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. What's wrong with that? Nothing -- in 2020.
But the long-term federal deficit crisis doesn't have very much to do with Defense spending. It's a health care problem riding on the back of more expensive medicine and longer-living patients. The commission begins to approach this problem by repealing the employer health care tax exclusion (which makes your office health care tax-free) and calling for pay-for-performance incentives to move away from a system that pays doctors to over-treat you. But it's hard to put into a magazine article (or any article) exactly how you plan to change insurance motives, patient incentives, provider-pricing and the other variables that contribute to rising health care prices in and outside Medicare.
If you're looking for one simple takeaway from the piece, try this: Balancing the budget by 2020 almost entirely through spending cuts is doable, if you cut defense spending by 40 percent.
We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to email@example.com.