Small homes are a part of the character of San Francisco. So when the owners of the largest residential lot in the city announced their plans to increase the footprint on their nearly one acre property, the neighbors went to battle. Located in Monterey Heights, the "Asian Beverly Hills" of San Francisco, the home belongs to the Chinese Consulate, and is therefore afforded special protections by the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations. The diplomatic mission could do as they pleased. Still, they pursued a diplomatic solution to help appease their neighbors, and soon after began construction on a seven-bedroom, two-bathroom, two-sitting room and two-tearoom add-on to the compound.
The neighbors didn't know that the expansion of the Consulate was only one sign of an increasingly close relationship between the city of San Francisco and China. In particular, the city of San Francisco has been pursuing a thoughtful policy to recruit Chinese clean technology companies to headquarter themselves in the city. San Francisco's approach stands in stark contrast to the tenor of many recent U.S. gestures towards China.
An increasing number of voices in the U.S. are ratcheting up the rhetoric on China's domestic clean technology investments, in the hopes of creating a domestic groundswell for U.S. leadership. New York Times columnist Tom Friedman writes, "[China] sees the future trends and is betting on them. Indeed, I suspect China is quietly laughing at us right now." Elizabeth Lynch, in Foreign Policy Digest, writes, "In today's globalized economy, rising powers like China are willing and readily able to capitalize on America's missed opportunities." Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY) has said that "there's no question that China is ignoring trade rules in order to cheat themselves into first place in the clean energy manufacturing race."
But these voices, pulling upon traditional jingoistic impulses in the American public, are playing a dangerous game. Clean technology advances will require global investments, and the future economic success of the United States in this arena will require collaboration not competition. Joshua Green quotes the need for 13,000 new gigawatts of clean energy installed in the next thirty years in order to keep us at a level of carbon in the atmosphere of 450 ppm. That's basically like installing a thousand large wind turbines or a nuclear power plant every day across the world. Today we're not moving at a fraction of that rate. And that gets us to the heart of the issue. If we assume that climate change is not just a national business opportunity, but an existential challenge for humanity, can we fight this challenge with national agendas alone? After all, it doesn't matter whether coal is being burned in Arizona or Guangzhou, the CO2 is everyone's problem.
We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to firstname.lastname@example.org.