If you want to understand the debate about the economy, weak job growth and what to do about it, focus on this number: $1.8 trillion. In short time, the statistic that S&P 500 companies are sitting on a record $1.8 trillion in excess cash has become a microcosm of the entire macroeconomic melee. One side looks at the number and says: companies aren't investing because consumers aren't buying. Another side looks at the number and says: companies aren't investing because they're nervous about making big plans while the government's fidgety hands keep changing health policy, energy policy, finance policy, tax policy...
I'm waiting on a few conversations with conservative economists, but until then, let's talk about why it's unfair to blame President Obama for uncertainty about tax policy.
Our
huge debt obligations will require, among other things, higher taxes. That's not Obama's choice to make, it's just the reality he has to deal
with. The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the Bush-era tax cuts and the
recession are the main drivers of this year's deficit. Today, the wars costs
have stabilized and started to go down, and the recession is easing,
slowly. What's left is the Bush tax cuts. Any person in the Oval Office
would feel political and economic pressure to let parts expire in December. And the logical place to begin to recoup
money is by letting them expire on the richest earners who took home
most of the tax cut.
Some economic
commentators, looking to protect both the fragile recovery and our
long-term solvency, have suggested that we extend the entire thing for
two years and then begin to phase it out. But even this could have drawbacks. First it will increase the deficit. Second, by Greg Mankiw's logic, it wouldn't stimulate much anyway, since households would just sit on their
money in expectation of a larger tax hike later.
In short: it doesn't make sense to blame the sitting president for inheriting a recession, a deficit, and an expiring tax cut in successive years. The year 2011 was going to be tough for taxes no matter who sat in the Oval Office.
We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to letters@theatlantic.com.
