Okay, can some legal genius explain to me, using small words and maybe some charts, why denying convicted felons the right to DNA tests that might prove their innocence is not a gross miscarriage of justice?  It's not that I think that every good thing is therefore a constitutional right.  But the basic outline of the rules for determining guilt and innocence is right there in the constitution.

What's even more depressing is that libertarians like me can't even count on getting a better result on things like this from our new liberal judge.  Reputedly, she's very pro-prosecutor.