Richard Florida's cover story in the latest Atlantic is interesting throughout, but this paragraph struck me in particular.
Thirty years ago, educational attainment was spread relatively uniformly throughout the country, but that's no longer the case. Cities like Seattle, San Francisco, Austin, Raleigh, and Boston now have two or three times the concentration of college graduates of Akron or Buffalo. Among people with postgraduate degrees, the disparities are wider still. The geographic sorting of people by ability and educational attainment, on this scale, is unprecedented.
There seems to be a lot of sorting taking place in America. Marriage has become more assortative. I suspect that going to college is a lot about sorting, which I think explains why parents are willing to pay almost any price to have their children attend colleges where other parents are willing (and able) to pay almost any price. Ross Douthat worries that the Republican Party could lose its intellectual base of libertarians and become a purely anti-intellectual party.
If you're a committed liberal, you think, "Oh, goody. The educated people know what's good for the uneducated people. Well make this a much better country." My own view is that the the people who think they know what's good for everyone, from Robert McNamara and McGeorge Bundy through Ben Bernanke, Henry Paulson, and Larry Summers, can get it spectacularly wrong
The most dangerous thing about sorting is
that it serves to insulate the elite. As a result, they can lose any
sense of humility or self-restraint.