This Volokh Conspiracy thread on a student suing over a curved "C" set me wondering: why are curves so common, anyway? Both my schools graded on a curve, which arguably served as a check against grade inflation--but are the incentives for grade inflation really so great that it couldn't be held back by a general agreement among the faculty that a "C" is average?

Moreover, the curve isn't merely for overall performance; it's done on each exam. In some classes, a 55% on an exam can be an A. But why do faculty, particularly at the undergraduate level where the task is mastery of a basic body of knowlege, set exams where the majority of the students can't answer a majority of the questions? Or, conversely, as I've also seen happen, where the difference between an A and a C is a few points, because everyone scored in the high 90's? Is figuring out what your students are likely to know really so hard for an experienced teacher?

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to letters@theatlantic.com.