Trump’s defenders suggest that White House aides could exculpate the president—but the evidence suggests otherwise.
As the Judiciary Committee drafts its articles of impeachment, it will have to decide how much of the special counsel’s findings it wants to include.
Trump’s Senate trial will force voters to evaluate nihilism as the governing philosophy of a political movement.
The president is turning to the same strategies he used against Robert Mueller to fend off Congress.
A public once enamored of Robert Mueller now turns its eyes to a cadre of career diplomats.
Witnesses are providing Congress with the record of presidential misbehavior it needs.
Has the expectation that presidents will act in a public-spirited matter now also become a partisan stance?
Women have been degraded on the internet for a long time—but using nonconsensual pornography for partisan ends dramatizes the dangers anew.
The president’s critics and his defenders spent the week debating rules.
The power of the stories is how normal they are.
Trump insists on editing reality to conform to his own needs—if necessary, with a Sharpie.
The House Judiciary Committee takes the first step—but also brings a vital constitutional process down to the level of political horse-trading.
A presidential candidate shouldn’t be endorsing the potential prosecution of a political opponent.
Neither Congress nor the press did enough to tell the American people what they needed to know.
Taking action against Trump is a rejection of the idea that nothing matters.
Encouraged by lawmakers’ passivity, the president is taking the same approach to 2020 that he took to 2016.
Focusing on the Mueller report alone risks leaving out the obvious.
The president regards the border as a lawless space, where courts have no purchase and the only thing that matters is strength of will.
Until it’s released to the public, the country will float in a state of suspended animation.
It wasn’t what the president’s former attorney said. It was how Elijah Cummings responded.