The world’s greatest deliberative body? Really?
The document released by the president’s lawyers reads more like the scream of a wounded animal than a traditional legal filing.
Prepare for peak tedium.
A guide for the perplexed to the House-Senate standoff over impeachment
The constitutional drama now playing out may feel like a circus, but the antics of the two parties are more than mere jousting: They are efforts to shape how the story will be understood for years to come.
The Senate majority leader seems uninterested in fulfilling his constitutional duties.
Trump’s defenders suggest that White House aides could exculpate the president—but the evidence suggests otherwise.
As the Judiciary Committee drafts its articles of impeachment, it will have to decide how much of the special counsel’s findings it wants to include.
Trump’s Senate trial will force voters to evaluate nihilism as the governing philosophy of a political movement.
The president is turning to the same strategies he used against Robert Mueller to fend off Congress.
A public once enamored of Robert Mueller now turns its eyes to a cadre of career diplomats.
Witnesses are providing Congress with the record of presidential misbehavior it needs.
Has the expectation that presidents will act in a public-spirited matter now also become a partisan stance?
Women have been degraded on the internet for a long time—but using nonconsensual pornography for partisan ends dramatizes the dangers anew.
The president’s critics and his defenders spent the week debating rules.
The power of the stories is how normal they are.
Trump insists on editing reality to conform to his own needs—if necessary, with a Sharpie.
The House Judiciary Committee takes the first step—but also brings a vital constitutional process down to the level of political horse-trading.
A presidential candidate shouldn’t be endorsing the potential prosecution of a political opponent.
Neither Congress nor the press did enough to tell the American people what they needed to know.