
|
Sam Adams
War of Numbers
(Steerforth Press, 1994)
From the Appendix
WHAT FOLLOWS IS A DETAILED ACCOUNT of how
General Westmoreland's intelligence staff -- with White House encouragement --
falsified the Vietcong strength estimates before the communist Tet Offensive of
January 1968. It is by far the most heavily researched portion of the book. My
sources include forty military and twelve civilian intelligence officials,
voluminous files of official reports, and other correspondence, such as letters
home. I have yet to interview the four persons still living whom I believe
chiefly responsible for the falsification: General Westmoreland himself,
General Philip Davidson (Westmoreland's J-2 after McChristian), Mr. Robert S.
McNamara, and Mr.Walt W. Rostow. I plan to approach them before the book goes
to press, in the hope that they will shed further light on what happened,
including the extent of President Johnson's involvement.
As already noted, MACV discovered its vast underestimate of Vietcong numbers in
late 1966. Westmoreland's then J-2, General Joseph A. McChristian, although
embarrassed, admitted his error, and by early 1967 was pressing for a higher
order of battle. At this point, the main resistance against one came from the
Pentagon, including the office of the secretary of defense, Robert S. McNamara.
As McNamara explained to an aide in late January, he realized the official OB
was all wrong, but that he was not yet prepared to tell Congress. He meant what
he said. On 6 March 1967, he briefed a Congressional committeeusing the
official numbers, the same ones he knew to be low.
McChristian's response to the Pentagon's foot-dragging was to adopta second set
of books. Kept informally by his OB chief, Colonel Gains B. Hawkins, the second
set listed the lesser three of the OB's four parts.The total for its most
important component -- the VC's main battleforces -- remained public knowledge.
To MACV strength analysts (mostly unaware that a controversy existed) the
compromise was satisfactory.None of them felt much pressure to raise or lower
their numbers for any reason other than evidence.
Incredibly, General Westmoreland during this period seems not to have grasped
what the full public impact might be of the higher numbers.Furthermore he had
neglected to add them all up. He received his first detailed briefing on the
second set of books, with their big sums totaled, in May 1967. General
McChristian and Colonel Hawkins conducted the briefing in Westmoreland's private
office. Using a flipchart, they reviewed the OB's four components one by one,
and when they reached the bottom line on the flipchart's last page, Westmoreland
-- according to my source -- "almost fell off his chair." "What will I tell
Congress?" he gasped. "What will I tell the press?" On recovering, some minutes
later,he turned to McChristian and said: "General, I want you to take
another look at those numbers."
McChristian took this as a suggestion to tamper with the second set of books.
This he refused to do. He was sent home on 1 June 1967, protesting vigorously.
At least some of his chagrin arose from the fact that his replacement was his
archrival in the Army, an old West Point classmate, General Philip Davidson.
Davidson was more amenable than McChristian to manipulating the unofficial
books. Among his first acts on 1 June was to lobby with the agency's DDI
representative in Saigon to drop from the OB one of its main subcomponents, the
so-called self-defense militia (or tu ve). Davidson's suggestion flew back and
forth between Saigon and Washington for over a month. It came up at a meeting
between Westmoreland and McNamara in Vietnam on 9 July, and again when
the general and the secretary saw President Johnson at the White House on
the thirteenth. Exactly what transpired at these meetings I have yet to find
out,but what happened thereafter is clear.
MACV strength analysts began to suspect that someone was doctoring the order of
battle. Among the first to harbor this suspicion was Lieutenant Joseph Gorman,
chief analyst for the VC main battle forces in IV Corps, which comprised South
Vietnam's southernmost and most populous quarter. One of his jobs was to warn
J-2 headquarters each time he discovered a new VC unit, so that J-2 could add it
to the OB. During this period, however, he found the headquarters increasingly
reluctant to enter new units on the lists. At first he thought that J-2 had
tightened its "acceptance criteria," but as the summer wore on its reasons
for disallowing new units became more and more frivolous. One VC battalion was
turned down by J-2 because Gorman's request form had a typographical error;
another because the form's cover sheet was not centered; a third because the
sheet lacked the proper red-pencil markings. A second analyst, Lieutenant
Richard McArthur -- assigned in June to keeptrack of VC guerrillas countrywide
-- wrote his parents on 26 July that he had found that the guerrilla number for
II Corps was "completely false,"and that J-2 was "feeding people nonsense
figures with no documentary evidence." He added, "I can't believe half the
things I'm digging up."
Meanwhile, pressure continued to build on the order of battle. At the Board of
National Estimates conference on Fourteen Three -- convened in Langley in June
-- the CIA was still insisting on higher numbers. By August, its sessions had
reached an impasse, and the principals had agreed to meet at an OB conference at
Westmoreland's headquarters in early September -- with CIA, DIA, and MACV
attending. The purpose of the conference was to come to an agreement over VC
strength.
MACV's preparations for the conference were both above board and below it. In
one of the war's most unusual messages, dated 20 August, MACV deputy General
Creighton Abrams cabled Washington, with Westmoreland's approval, the old
request to drop the self-defense militia from the OB. What made the cable so
extraordinary was the frank reason he gave for wanting to do so. To leave the
militia on the lists, he explained, would contradict the "image of success" MACV
had been lately building, and would provoke the press into drawing "an erroneous
and gloomy conclusion" over the progress of the war. The message was widely
distributed in official Washington.
MACV's below-board measures were also unusual. No longer content to exclude
units from the OB, J-2 now began to cut down the size of units already in it.
Marshall W. Lynn, a lieutenant charged with keeping tabs on six regiment-sized
VC formations near Saigon, has explained how it was done. One morning shortly
before the start of the scheduled conference, a colonel from J-2 stopped by
Lynn's desk with the suggestion that the strengths at which Lynn was carrying
his six VC units were "way too high." Lynn denied it, at which the colonel
simply picked up Lynn's strength sheet, crossed out the numbers by each
regiment, and penciled in new ones, on the average one-third lower. To Lynn's
amazement, a unit which he had carried with 3,100 men became "1,900" instead. As
for J-2's acceptance criteria for new units, Gorman remarked that by
early September, "you could march a VC regiment down the hall, and they wouldn't
put it in the OB."
The conference, which I describe at length in Chapter 5, ended with the CIA
caving in on the first day, 11 September. And the order of battle, instead of
doubling -- to reflect the evidence discovered in late 1966 -- actually fell,
from about 290,000 to just over 240,000. As Chapter 5 points out, the drop was
accomplished by marching the subcomponent, the self-defense militia, from the
lists (as well as another whole category, the so-called political cadres) and by
a general acceptance of J-2's "scaled down" numbers. Among those dismayed by the
proceedings was DIA's chief order-of-battle analyst, Captain Barrie Williams.
Captain Williams felt "the whole session was painful. It was clear we were
double-dealing."
Copyright © 1994 by Anne Adams. Pages 212-215. All rights
reserved.
|