Do You Know About the Leap Second?

It's what's keeps us tethered to the quaint notion that "a day" is equal to one rotation of the Earth.
More

The mechanics of the leap year are well known: We add a day to February every four years to maintain the synchronization of our earthly calendar with the celestial reality of the Earth's orbit.

Weeelllll, it turns out that a similar phenomenon plays out on a much smaller time scale. Along with the leap year, there is the leap second.

Here, let Demetrios Matsakis explain. He's the chief scientist for time services at the US Naval Observatory and the star of one of the best videos you're ever going to watch, Where Time Comes From (which I've embedded above). This is an outtake from that video, which was produced by the genius Katherine Wells

"Until 1971, our standard of time was the rotation of the Earth," Matsakis says. "One turn of the Earth was one day, divided into hours, minutes, and seconds."

This version of time, variability included, has a name: Universal Time 1, or UT1. So, 86,400 seconds in a day (24*60*60). Simple. 

But scientists who had been working with atomic clocks already knew that the length of a day, as measured by the Earth's rotation, was variable. In any given rotation, the sun may be off from our perfect temporal abstraction by a tenth of a millisecond. A day, as measured by a rotation, might be 86,400.0001 seconds or 86,399.9999 seconds. 

Scientists also realized that the Earth's rotation is not only variable but slowing a teensy tiny bit. Something like a couple milliseconds per day per century, although the rate changes. 

Now, the official time of record—called UTC or Temps Universel Coordonné, Coordinated Universal Time—is defined by atomic clocks, which use processes that are less inconsistent than the planet spinning on its axis.  

To Matsakis, a second is not a division of a day, but "9,192,631,770 periods of oscillation in a undisturbed cesium atom." That matches up pretty closely with 1/86400 of any given rotation, but not precisely.

And if anything defines atomic clocks, it is precision. As measured by these clocks, the rate of time's advance doesn't change by more than 0.0000000001 seconds per day

So, the variability of the Earth's rotation is not a purely theoretical consideration. Time scientist could do nothing about the problem and time as defined by Earth's physical motion and cesium atoms oscillations would slowly drift apart. Just a bit, but a bit. 

Or they could do what they did: which is to reconcile the two times by changing the time on atomic clocks. On a given day, like Saturday, June 30, 2012, the second after 23:59:59, the atomically defined UTC clock does not go to 00:00:00 and the next day, but shows 23:59:60, before allowing July to begin. 

There have been 25 leap seconds since 1972 when the reconciling process began. Of course there is a list on the Internet.

But, it turns out, there are no future leap seconds scheduled for now.

And there's some real controversy over the future of leap seconds. There are meetings to discuss the issue like the "ITU-R SRG 7A Colloquium on the UTC timescale" and blog posts on the ITU's website with headlines like, "Time to Leave Leap Seconds Behind?

Leap seconds are a "quaint notion," some argue, that's unnecessary and possibly even destabilizing for GPS receivers satellites, which rely on UTC. 

In 2015, delegates to the World Radiocommunication Assembly will vote on the future of the leap second.

If they choose to abolish them, we'll have ended the kluge that kept us tethered to the most basic human notion of time, the daily motion of the planet. 

It's a cesium oscillation world. We're just living in it.

Update 3/1: With feedback from Matsakis, I've corrected and clarified a couple small things.

Jump to comments
Presented by

Alexis C. Madrigal

Alexis Madrigal is the deputy editor of TheAtlantic.com. He's the author of Powering the Dream: The History and Promise of Green Technology. More

The New York Observer has called Madrigal "for all intents and purposes, the perfect modern reporter." He co-founded Longshot magazine, a high-speed media experiment that garnered attention from The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and the BBC. While at Wired.com, he built Wired Science into one of the most popular blogs in the world. The site was nominated for best magazine blog by the MPA and best science website in the 2009 Webby Awards. He also co-founded Haiti ReWired, a groundbreaking community dedicated to the discussion of technology, infrastructure, and the future of Haiti.

He's spoken at Stanford, CalTech, Berkeley, SXSW, E3, and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and his writing was anthologized in Best Technology Writing 2010 (Yale University Press).

Madrigal is a visiting scholar at the University of California at Berkeley's Office for the History of Science and Technology. Born in Mexico City, he grew up in the exurbs north of Portland, Oregon, and now lives in Oakland.

Get Today's Top Stories in Your Inbox (preview)

CrossFit Versus Yoga: Choose a Side

How a workout becomes a social identity


Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

CrossFit Versus Yoga: Choose a Side

How a workout becomes a social identity

Video

Is Technology Making Us Better Storytellers?

The minds behind House of Cards and The Moth weigh in.

Video

A Short Film That Skewers Hollywood

A studio executive concocts an animated blockbuster. Who cares about the story?

Video

In Online Dating, Everyone's a Little Bit Racist

The co-founder of OKCupid shares findings from his analysis of millions of users' data.

Video

What Is a Sandwich?

We're overthinking sandwiches, so you don't have to.

Video

Let's Talk About Not Smoking

Why does smoking maintain its allure? James Hamblin seeks the wisdom of a cool person.

Writers

Up
Down

More in Technology

Just In