What Does 'Open' Mean? One Academic Weighs In

"Openness is nothing like an absolute value."
More
Shutterstock/Kevin George

When talking about educational technology, what does the idea of “openness” mean? The word “open” appears in both “open-access publishing” and “MOOCs” (massively open online courses), but does it represent the same things? Does it stand for the same values, or help the same set of people?

A small essay by Amherst College professor John Drabinski, published today, examines the word in the context of a higher education institution confronted with contemporary technological choices.

In 2013, Drabinski writes, the Amherst faculty had to decide on three big questions:

  1. Should they make a digital repository of faculty publications available?
  2. Should they make Amherst College Press, the college’s official publisher, an open-access press?
  3. Should they accept or refuse offers from Udacity, Coursera and EdX to convert some of the college’s best-known courses into MOOCs?

All of these questions turn on the concept of “openness.“ Two concerned “open-access publishing," one "massively open online courses." The Amherst faculty chose to create a digital repository and make Amherst College Press “open-access," but not to capitulate to MOOC manufacturers.

Drabinski’s post has a long explanation of why, in addition to a great inside look at what it feels like to be wooed by a MOOC instructor. (The companies continually assured Amherst of its “specialness.”) Ultimately, the faculty decided the first two were beneficial to the fellowship of scholars, and the latter was not. MOOCs could put scholars out of work; an open-access repository could make more knowledge available to good researchers who were not affiliated with an institution or university library.

This is the developing, conscientious line among academics: Pro-openness on open-access; anti-openness on MOOCs. (Just last week, a professor at Princeton, Mitchell Duneier, stopped teaching his popular MOOC “out of concerns that it would undermine public higher education.”

So when is openness good? Drabinski’s little explication is, I think, useful:

It occurred to me then, after we discussed this in pairs and groups and as a whole faculty, as it occurred to most, that openness is nothing like an absolute value. In fact, it is a value that is made good by what it enhances in self and offers to others. When we publish, openness is a value because it enhances our visibility and offers ideas to others without classist and cultural conditions. If you think that is worth doing, you support (in this case) the repository and the press.

He continues, and it’s worth reading. But this is an elegant, short rebuttal to the  always-positive buzzword senses of “open,” and a nice framework for thinking and handling the whole rhetoric of openness. “Openness is nothing like an absolute value.” Well said.

Jump to comments
Presented by

Robinson Meyer is an associate editor at The Atlantic, where he covers technology.

Get Today's Top Stories in Your Inbox (preview)

A Technicolor Time-Lapse of Alaska's Northern Lights

The beauty of aurora borealis, as seen from America's last frontier


Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

A Time-Lapse of Alaska's Northern Lights

The beauty of aurora borealis, as seen from America's last frontier

Video

What Do You Wish You Learned in College?

Ivy League academics reveal their undergrad regrets

Video

Famous Movies, Reimagined

From Apocalypse Now to The Lord of the Rings, this clever video puts a new spin on Hollywood's greatest hits.

Video

What Is a City?

Cities are like nothing else on Earth.

Video

CrossFit Versus Yoga: Choose a Side

How a workout becomes a social identity

Video

In Online Dating, Everyone's a Little Bit Racist

The co-founder of OKCupid shares findings from his analysis of millions of users' data.

Writers

Up
Down

More in Technology

Just In