Chart: When Will We Eat Hamburgers Grown in Test Tubes?

The long-road to yesterday's test-tube burger debut in London, and beyond

InVitroMeatComplete.png

A couple people ate some hamburger in London yesterday. Not generally noteworthy, except that the burger cost $330,000 to produce and the meat was grown in a lab, not a cow. It was flavored with salt, breadcrumbs, and egg powder; red beet juice and saffron gave the cells a meatier hue. It's the first in-vitro burger ever created (though some artistic antecedents exist).

Cattle stem cells were cultured on scaffolding, which is required to give the meat something like the texture we're used to in our animal proteins. This is an immensely difficult and expensive task, as biologist Christina Agapakis pointed out last year. Nonetheless, the burger marks a major milestone for Mark Post, a biologist at the University of Maastricht, who has been working in this area of tissue engineering for many years.

Ever since I started following in-vitro meat at Wired six years ago, I've noticed a trend. Each time there's a media moment about test tube burgers, dozens of writers discover the existence of this corner of science and get an expert make a prediction about "when we'll see this kind of meat on supermarket shelves," or whatever.

This time around, Reuters got Post to predict commercialization in 20 years, but there have been many other types of forecasts. My intuition was that the predictions were always just far enough into the future to make them checking them unlikely. So I made this chart with some help from my memory, Google News, and Lexis Nexis, so that we can all keep track going forward; the data's embedded below and linked here.

What's it show? Well, most of the short-term predictions have underestimated how long any individual milestone might take to reach. As the burger demonstrates, the technology is advancing, but very slowly, and the commercialization horizon hasn't really gotten any closer over the last eight years. In fact, it may have receded.

The predictions varied widely in specificity, too. In the chart above, I always translated "a few years" as three years, exactly. It may not surprise you that none of the predictions using fuzzy language have been close to on-target.  

There is a broader trend in the prediction data, too. While most prognostications in the early days were about the kinds of meat that might become available (burgers vs steaks), more recent ones have focused on when these types of products could become available to consumers.

Presented by

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register with Disqus.

Please note that The Atlantic's account system is separate from our commenting system. To log in or register with The Atlantic, use the Sign In button at the top of every page.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

A New York City Minute, Frozen in Time

This short film takes you on a whirling tour of the Big Apple

Video

What Happened to the Milky Way?

Light pollution has taken away our ability to see the stars. Can we save the night sky?

Video

The Faces of #BlackLivesMatter

Scenes from a recent protest in New York City

Video

Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Life

The Supreme Court justice talks gender equality and marriage.

Video

The Pentagon's $1.5 Trillion Mistake

The F-35 fighter jet was supposed to do everything. Instead, it can barely do anything.

More in Technology

Just In