Oops! This Lab Neglected to Return the Samples of Moondust NASA Loaned It

Something to make you feel better about those library books you still haven't returned
[optional image description]
One of the 20 vials of moondust found in Berkeley storage (Marilee Bailey via Berkeley Lab)

In 1969, after the Apollo 11 crew returned from their historic mission to the moon, the rocks and soil samples they collected were put to use in scientific research. NASA divided the lunar spoils Armstrong and Aldrin had gathered so painstakingly into small vials, sending the samples out to more than 150 laboratories around the world. The samples -- the single souvenir of more than 800,000 miles of travel -- were loaners rather than donations: after the labs conducted their experiments, they were meant to return the moondust to NASA.

One lab, however, neglected to make that return. And -- in a twist that says as much about government bureaucracy as it does about scientific -- we're just now realizing the oversight. And only because of an accident. Last month, Karen Nelson, an archivist at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, was reviewing and clearing out some of the items stored in the lab's large warehouse. Nelson came across a set of 20 vials, vacuum-sealed in a glass jar. Each contained a small amount of gray dust, and each had a handwritten label: "Apollo, 11" and "24 July 1970."


Yes. For nearly 43 years, Nelson realized, small samples of the moon had been sitting in storage in Berkeley. The moon dust, on Earth, had been ... gathering dust.

So what led to that happening? How did the samples fail to make their way back to NASA? While "we don't know how or when they ended up in storage," Nelson says, it's likely that the samples were used in research that led to the publication of a paper she found included with the stash: "Study of carbon compounds in Apollo 11 and Apollo 12 returned lunar samples" [pdf], published in the Proceedings of the Second Lunar Science Conference in 1971. The paper analyzed the physical characteristics of the carbon in the lunar samples. Each of the paper's five co-authors came from Berkeley's Space Sciences Laboratory -- and one of them was Melvin Calvin, the 1961 winner of the Nobel Prize in chemistry, and a researcher who would go on to help shape NASA's efforts in the search for extraterrestrial life.

So Nelson, figuring out what she had, almost literally, on her hands, did what any self-respecting archivist would do: she tried to track down the source of her find. But people at the Space Sciences Laboratory "were surprised we had the samples," she said. So Nelson finally contacted the primary source of the moonrocks: NASA. And the agency allowed her to remove the vials from their vacuum-sealed jar, letting the lucky archivist look more closely at the fine, gray powder that had been gathered by a pair of adventurous humans four eventful decades ago. 

And then it asked her to send the samples back.

Presented by

Megan Garber is a staff writer at The Atlantic.

How to Cook Spaghetti Squash (and Why)

Cooking for yourself is one of the surest ways to eat well. Bestselling author Mark Bittman teaches James Hamblin the recipe that everyone is Googling.

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.

blog comments powered by Disqus


How to Cook Spaghetti Squash (and Why)

Cooking for yourself is one of the surest ways to eat well.


Before Tinder, a Tree

Looking for your soulmate? Write a letter to the "Bridegroom's Oak" in Germany.


The Health Benefits of Going Outside

People spend too much time indoors. One solution: ecotherapy.


Where High Tech Meets the 1950s

Why did Green Bank, West Virginia, ban wireless signals? For science.


Yes, Quidditch Is Real

How J.K. Rowling's magical sport spread from Hogwarts to college campuses


Would You Live in a Treehouse?

A treehouse can be an ideal office space, vacation rental, and way of reconnecting with your youth.

More in Technology

Just In