The State of Contemporary Journalism, as Revealed in a Letter from 1891

More

"Not a large sum, to-be-sure ..."

[optional image description]
Not the actual letter. (Shutterstock/Reinhold Leitner)

From 1896 to 1899, Walter Hines Page -- who would later become the U.S. Ambassador to Great Britain -- was the editor of a little magazine then known as The Atlantic Monthly. Before taking that post, though, Page was the editor of another monthly, The Forum. In 1891, Page accepted, on behalf of that periodical, an article submission from William Roscoe Thayer. And the note he sent to inform Thayer of this development was a classic good news/bad news affair: On the one hand, acceptance! On the other ... sorry, Sir, but lousy pay.

My dear Sir:

I thank you for submitting your interesting paper on "Europe's Military Frankenstein," which I shall be glad to use in an early number of The Forum. I shall ask you to accept our check for the sum we usually pay per article -- $75, which is not a large sum, to-be-sure. We shall be able to give you, however, the most appreciative audience reached, we think, by any periodical.

Page's letter was discovered by Sydney Bufkin, who found it, she told me, while doing research on Page at the Houghton manuscript library at Harvard. Bufkin points out that the $75 payment Page felt the need to apologize for equates to $1,796.34 in 2010 dollars. ("The letter doesn't say how long the article was," Bufkin adds, "but I'd guess not more than 2 or 3 thousand words.")

In today's freelance marketplace, for the most part, a couple thousand dollars for a couple thousand words would not only be nothing at all to apologize for; it would also likely buy you, in addition to a thorough journalistic feature: several more thorough journalistic features, and/or original photos, and/or an ebook, and/or a couple of ebooks, and/or naming rights to the author's children. So the thought of an editor apologizing for that pay rate is, depending on your perspective, either hilarious or tragic. 

What is perhaps most striking, however, is the justification Page offers for his "modest" sum. "We shall be able to give you," he informs Thayer, "the most appreciative audience reached, we think, by any periodical." In other words: Don't do it for the money, do it for the attention! Do it for the eyeballs! Do it for the appreciation! Here, Page -- illustrious journalist, respected publisher, soon-to-be-diplomat -- anticipates the economic logic of The Huffington Post. The "attention economy" may be new as a bit of jargon; as a feature of journalism, however, it's centuries old.

Jump to comments
Presented by

Megan Garber is a staff writer at The Atlantic. She was formerly an assistant editor at the Nieman Journalism Lab, where she wrote about innovations in the media.

Get Today's Top Stories in Your Inbox (preview)

Is Technology Making Us Better Storytellers?

How have stories changed in the age of social media? The minds behind House of Cards, This American Life, and The Moth discuss.


Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

Is Technology Making Us Better Storytellers?

The minds behind House of Cards and The Moth weigh in.

Video

A Short Film That Skewers Hollywood

A studio executive concocts an animated blockbuster. Who cares about the story?

Video

In Online Dating, Everyone's a Little Bit Racist

The co-founder of OKCupid shares findings from his analysis of millions of users' data.

Video

What Is a Sandwich?

We're overthinking sandwiches, so you don't have to.

Video

Let's Talk About Not Smoking

Why does smoking maintain its allure? James Hamblin seeks the wisdom of a cool person.

Writers

Up
Down

More in Technology

Just In