Russian Wikipedia Shuts Itself Down in Protest of Proposed Censorship Law

More

Those visiting Russia's Wikipedia today will see only a statement against the Information Act, which will be debated in the State Duma tomorrow.

russiawikipedia.jpg

Russian-speakers looking up something in Wikipedia today won't find the usual web of articles but the statement of protest pictured above. Translated into English by the BBC, the message reads:

The State Duma is expected to hold a second hearing about amendments to the Information Act, which could lead to the creation of extra-judicial censorship of the entire internet in Russia, including banning access to Wikipedia in the Russian language.

Today the Wikipedia community voices protest against the introduction of censorship, which is dangerous for the freedom of knowledge - something which must be open-access for all mankind.

The law, which the State Duma will consider tomorrow, would ostensibly be used to shut down child-pornography and suicide-promotion sites, but Internet-freedom advocates say that its scope is much, much wider, and that it will create a Russian equivalent of China's Great Firewall. According to the BBC, if approved, the bill "would allow the government to set up an agency which would maintain a list of banned sites."

Russian Wikipedia was not alone in its self-enforced protest. LiveJournal, the tenth most popular website in Russia according to Alexa.com, also posted a note of protest, writing, "LiveJournal considers the introduction of any restrictions on freedom of expression and information in the Internet to be unacceptable."

This is (by my count -- let me know if I've missed any) the third such protest taken by an edition of Wikipedia. In October, Italy's Wikipedia piloted the shutdown tactic in opposition to a censorship bill proposed by Silvio Berlusconi. In January, the English-language version did much the same in protest of the SOPA/PIPA legislation then under consideration in Congress. With today's Russian-language shutdown, the pattern suggests that this is now Wikipedia's go-to plan for what its editors see as crisis-points -- censorship bills on the cusp of becoming laws. The choice to self-censor, even for just a day, sends a powerful message to Wikipedia's users that greater government regulation of the Internet is a real and immediate possibility.

Jump to comments
Presented by

Rebecca J. Rosen is a senior editor at The Atlantic, where she oversees the Business Channel. She was previously an associate editor at The Wilson Quarterly.

Get Today's Top Stories in Your Inbox (preview)

The Remote Warehouse Where Confiscated Wildlife Ends Up

A government facility outside of Denver houses more than a million products of the illegal wildlife trade, from tigers and bears to bald eagles.


Elsewhere on the web

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

Where the Wild Things Go

A government facility outside of Denver houses more than a million products of the illegal wildlife trade, from tigers and bears to bald eagles.

Video

Adults Need Playtime Too

When was the last time you played your favorite childhood game?

Video

Is Wine Healthy?

James Hamblin prepares to impress his date with knowledge about the health benefits of wine.

Video

The World's Largest Balloon Festival

Nine days, more than 700 balloons, and a whole lot of hot air

Writers

Up
Down

More in Technology

Just In