Down With Factoid! Up With Factlet!


Norman Mailer is probably ashamed of you.

Psst. I have something to tell you: factoid probably doesn't mean what you think it means. Don't worry, though, you are not alone and you can change.

"Factoid is now almost exclusively used to mean a brief interesting fact," The Grammarist notes with resignation. "This definition is still considered incorrect by people who follow English usage, but it's so widespread that we have to accept it, even if it does contradict the word's original sense."

I, too, was once in league with the barbarians. I had thought a factoid was a diminutive form of fact more than a derogatory one. Just last week, I used the word factoid in a recent post on the boom box's stunning success ("That factoid is a sidenote in a 2011 paper that I stumbled on from the Journal of Management and Marketing Research," I wrote.)

 The next day, I received the following email from Jim Milstein of New Uraniborg, Colorado:

I wish you, and a whole lot of others, would cleave to Norman Mailer's original coinage of the word factoid.  The suffix -oid usually means resembling, but not really a member of some category.  Examples: humanoid, planetoid.  So a factoid should properly be (and as Mailer used it) something that resembles a fact, but is not a fact.  You, and the whole lot of others, ought instead to use another word for a small probably unimportant but interesting fact.  I suggest the coinage, factlet.  In all other respects, I enjoy your writing and wish you well.

My standard response to grammarian challenge is this: language changes and words acquire new meanings. Deal with it. And factoid is so damn useful, especially when you write blog posts on the web that often revolve around brief interesting facts like the boom box's triumph.

But then I started to think about it. This is not merely the stretching of the word's meaning but rather its inversion. What Mailer meant to mean, essentially, a "fake fact" has come to mean "an interesting fact." And his original meaning is built into the word via the suffix. Once I knew the original usage, the problem began to stare at me: factOID factOID factOID. And now, when the etymology of any word is a single Google search away, it is impossible to feign ignorance.

So, join me in shunning factoid and adopting factlet. We can set this historical wrong right. Who's coming with me? Who's coming with me? Down with factoid! Up with factlet!

This message brought to you by the Campaign to Eradicate Factoids. Follow us online at #STOPFACTOIDS2012.

Presented by

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register with Disqus.

Please note that The Atlantic's account system is separate from our commenting system. To log in or register with The Atlantic, use the Sign In button at the top of every page.

blog comments powered by Disqus


How a Psychedelic Masterpiece Is Made

A short documentary about Bruce Riley, an artist who paints abstract wonders with poured resin


Why Is Google Making Skin?

Hidden away on Google’s campus, doctors are changing the way people think about health.


How to Build a Tornado

A Canadian inventor believes his tornado machine could solve the world's energy crisis.


A New York City Minute, Frozen in Time

This short film takes you on a whirling tour of the Big Apple


What Happened to the Milky Way?

Light pollution has taken away our ability to see the stars. Can we save the night sky?

More in Technology

Just In