The Real Menace to Today's Passenger Ships: It's Not Icebergs

How disaster can strike, even 100 years after the Titanic

ship_reuters_post.jpg

Details of the grounding of the Mediterranean cruise ship Costa Concordia are still unclear, but it appears that the vessel struck a reef, killing at least six people, some of whom panicked and jumped overboard before the ship could be completely evacuated -- this only three months before the hundredth anniversary of the Titanic.

How could this have happened? What about all the advanced navigational equipment on today's ships? And especially, shouldn't hazards in the Mediterran be well mapped by now?

While the public's mind has been on icebergs (even though few passenger ships regularly travel the North Atlantic now), marine safety pros have been concerned about reefs. To quote from a document issued by a member of a voluntary research group, the Forensic Naval Architecture Committee, last fall, on the Titanic:

Q. Long tears down the side like the Titanic cannot happen again, right?

A. The solution to icebergs was radar. Unfortunately, pinnacle rocks and reefs don't show up on radar and can rip holes down the length of a ship. In 1998 Monarch of the Seas hit a reef with extensive holing down the length of the ship. Fortunately, there was a nearby beach to put her bow onto to avoid the risk of sinking. [Monarch incident background is available here. The complete report is here [pdf].]

Naval architects are once again pushing the boundaries of big -- 80,000 gross tons volume used to be a big ship but now considered moderate size in comparison to the 225,000 gross ton Allure of the Seas. There are still surprises out there -- nobody thought the outside of a cruise ship could catch on fire but it did on the Star Princess [pdf].

No lives were lost about the Monarch of the Seas, but another ship, the MS Sea Diamond, sank near the island of Santorini, also in the Mediterranean, leaving two passengers missing and presumed dead.

Besides the loss of life and economic damage in reef collisions, environmental damage can be catastrophic. I don't have an answer but it's worth pondering in the Titanic year: why has aviation, with such fragile craft and so many more things that can go wrong, improved its safety record so much more successfully than shipping?


Image: Reuters
Presented by

Edward Tenner is a historian of technology and culture, and an affiliate of the Center for Arts and Cultural Policy at Princeton's Woodrow Wilson School. He was a founding advisor of Smithsonian's Lemelson Center.

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register with Disqus.

Please note that The Atlantic's account system is separate from our commenting system. To log in or register with The Atlantic, use the Sign In button at the top of every page.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

What Happened to the Milky Way?

Light pollution has taken away our ability to see the stars. Can we save the night sky?

Video

The Faces of #BlackLivesMatter

Scenes from a recent protest in New York City

Video

Desegregated, Yet Unequal

A short documentary about the legacy of Boston busing

Video

Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Life

The Supreme Court justice talks gender equality and marriage.

Video

Social Media: The Video Game

What if the validation of your peers could "level up" your life?

Video

The Pentagon's $1.5 Trillion Mistake

The F-35 fighter jet was supposed to do everything. Instead, it can barely do anything.

More in Technology

From This Author

Just In