|
|
« Previous Madrigal | Next Madrigal » |
|
What Was Lost in the Switch From Typewriters to Computers
ByT. C. Boyle, lover of a good writing machine and never a longhand writer, reflects on the technology of his craft
T. C. Boyle loves a good writing machine. He's never been a longhand writer, he reveals in our special package, How Genius Works, and switched from an Olivetti typewriter to a computer in the 1990s. Which makes his nostalgic reflection on what he lost in that change all the more interesting: "The sort of corrections you see here are now made moment to moment in the process of composition -- and, of course, evidence of those corrections now vanishes with a keystroke, lost in the synaptical fire of the brain/computer matrix," he writes.
As James Somers noted here on The Atlantic, one can actually capture all that synaptical fire, but more in letter than in spirit. A revision process that would have taken a month on a long novel has become a three- or four-day task. Gone are the slow days of puzzling out the meaning of a page like the one above, and with them, the little bonuses of the slog.
Still, there was a pleasant rhythm to those hard-typing times, during which I would neatly stack up 10 to 12 finished pages daily, the whole business accumulating in a very satisfying way before I headed off to stroll through the woods or quaff a drink or two at the local bar. It was restful. Contemplative. Deeply satisfying. And let me tell you--and this is no small consideration--back then, I had the strongest fingers in the world.
I contemplate the differences between writing tools -- Scrivener vs. Microsoft Word vs. this little Moveable Type box -- because I do notice a difference in what come out of them. Scrivener, a James Fallows favorite, makes it easy to break up your writing into tidy compartments that sit in a sidebar on the left side of your screen. In the first few months I tried it out. But I found it made my writing too choppy, as I refined each section without reference to the whole. There is something about the never-ending scroll of the Word document that I like, and not just because I bought into the Kerouac mythology. (OK, it is because I bought into the Kerouac mythology.)





























Join the Discussion
After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus