Radiation Research May Be Slashed by Budget Cuts


As the Fukushima nuclear reactors continue to send low-doses of radiation outward and calls intensify to review the American nuclear plant fleet, a key research program that studies the health impacts of small amounts of radiation exposure could face elimination.

The Low Dose Radiation Research Program faces major budget cuts as part of cuts to the Department of Energy's Office of Science's Radiobiology budget [pdf].

Columbia biologist David J. Brenner, who studies radiation but is not funded by the DOE program, told The Atlantic that losing the low-dose radiation program "would really hurt our capabilities, moving forward, either to figure out how to respond sensibly to a large scale radiological event in this country or to figure out the best way forward in terms of the future of nuclear power."

Sadly, one way or another, it seems the low dose program is in trouble. The House budget would effectively leave the entire Biological and Environmental Research division within the Office of Science with no budget for the rest of fiscal year 2011. By capping its spending at about half of its budget from last year halfway through the year, there would be almost no money left to run the scientific operations. House Republicans appear to have targeted the division because of its emphasis on the basic science of climate change, according to a March 18 article in Science Magazine.

But even assuming the best possible scenario for the fiscal year 2011 budget, the Department of Energy's funding request for the fiscal year 2012 would cut the Radiobiology budget 45 percent. The total Radiobiology budget stands to have just $14.3 million to work with in fiscal year 2012, down from $25.9 million in 2010 and a requested $23.9 in 2011 [pdf].

So, even if the program survives Republican attacks, the DOE's own funding request means the Low Dose Radiation Research Program will still have to scale back research on precisely what happens to the body when it receives the kinds of small doses of radiation one receives flying cross-country, in medical imaging machines, passing through X-ray scanners, and after nuclear accidents.

In a Nature News editorial, Brenner called attention to the general problem of lack of research funding for precisely the topic of low-dose radiation, especially in a post-Fukushima world.

"The uncertainties associated with our best estimates of the health effects of low-doses of radiation are large," Brenner wrote. "And not knowing the risks means that we really don't know what is a reasonable evacuation zone, whom to evacuate, when to evacuate or when to allow people back."

At a time when the nation's nuclear future is up for reevaluation, this kind of research program should be strengthened, not cut back.

Regardless of how one comes down on nuclear power's past, present, or future, it just makes sense to know the effects of radiation on human beings. For nuclear proponents, more precisely determining the risks would allow them to make their case that such dosages pose little or no danger. Many nuclear opponents feel precisely the opposite. Only more research can definitely determine the health impacts of low-doses of radiation, if there are any.

The Low Dose Radiation Research Program is housed at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. We contacted both its program manager, Noelle Metting, the PNNL public affairs office, and the Department of Energy. They all declined to comment on the record or had not returned contacts by the time of publication.

Jump to comments
Presented by

Alexis C. Madrigal

Alexis Madrigal is the deputy editor of TheAtlantic.com. He's the author of Powering the Dream: The History and Promise of Green Technology. More

The New York Observer has called Madrigal "for all intents and purposes, the perfect modern reporter." He co-founded Longshot magazine, a high-speed media experiment that garnered attention from The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and the BBC. While at Wired.com, he built Wired Science into one of the most popular blogs in the world. The site was nominated for best magazine blog by the MPA and best science website in the 2009 Webby Awards. He also co-founded Haiti ReWired, a groundbreaking community dedicated to the discussion of technology, infrastructure, and the future of Haiti.

He's spoken at Stanford, CalTech, Berkeley, SXSW, E3, and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and his writing was anthologized in Best Technology Writing 2010 (Yale University Press).

Madrigal is a visiting scholar at the University of California at Berkeley's Office for the History of Science and Technology. Born in Mexico City, he grew up in the exurbs north of Portland, Oregon, and now lives in Oakland.

Get Today's Top Stories in Your Inbox (preview)

CrossFit Versus Yoga: Choose a Side

How a workout becomes a social identity

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus


Is Technology Making Us Better Storytellers?

The minds behind House of Cards and The Moth weigh in.


A Short Film That Skewers Hollywood

A studio executive concocts an animated blockbuster. Who cares about the story?


In Online Dating, Everyone's a Little Bit Racist

The co-founder of OKCupid shares findings from his analysis of millions of users' data.


What Is a Sandwich?

We're overthinking sandwiches, so you don't have to.


Let's Talk About Not Smoking

Why does smoking maintain its allure? James Hamblin seeks the wisdom of a cool person.



More in Technology

Just In