Long Live Blogs: As Readers Flee, Gawker Backtracks on Big Redesign

More

Gawker.com rolled out a new design Monday morning. Sort of. (More on that in a second.) We all knew it was coming: Founder Nick Denton laid out the changes in a 3,000-word memo that he published across his properties (the Gawker Network includes Jezebel, Jalopnik, io9, and a half-dozen other websites) in late November: "Why Gawker is moving beyond the blog." "The 2011 template represents the most significant change in the Gawker model since the launch of Gizmodo and Gawker in 2002," Denton wrote. "One could go further: it represents an evolution of the very blog form that has transformed online media over the last eight years." But is that what Gawker's readers want?

Pageviews fell at io9 and Jalopnik, two of the first Gawker properties to roll out the new design, by as much as 33 percent.

I don't think so. And the early numbers seem to back me up. Denton, an obsessive believer in analytics -- he is known for the giant screen in Gawker's office that displays the number of visitors each story has at any given moment -- knows this. That's why he's sort of given up already, though I suspect it will be a while before he admits it.

Before the beta site became the default site, it wouldn't have been unwise to guess that pageviews would actually increase with the new look. Instead of scanning through a handful of excerpts, readers would only be given one excerpt -- that for the primary story. The headlines would entice readers, or so this train of thought goes, to click through and read more. Click, click, click. (And ka-ching! goes the pageview counter, the lifeblood of all digital media properties.) 

With the old layout, there was little incentive to read many of the stories in full. The excerpt from one recent post, "Official Beer from the White House Bee Hive," reads: "The White House got all pretentious with its beer selection at yesterday's Super Bowl party. This concoction, the 'White House Honey Ale,' was made with one pound of honey from the White House Bee hive, and you'll never get to taste it." OK. That's all I needed. Next.

But a series of excerpts is not what Denton wanted. He envisioned a way to call out a particularly compelling story instead of burying it just because it had aged by a few hours -- or even minutes as Gawker's output continues to climb. When he references a transformation in his manifesto, Denton is talking about the move away from the traditional reverse-chronological blog format. In the new design, the blog scroll has been moved to the right-hand column, where headlines of each post are displayed in that old, familiar order. The primary column, which fills two thirds of the page, displays one big story -- "one visually appealing 'splash' story, typically built around compelling video or other widescreen imagery and run in full," is how Denton described it back in November. "At its best, a splash will match in visual impact the cover of a magazine or a European tabloid newspaper; and exceed it because the front-page image can actually move."

But Denton is already conceding, if not in words then certainly in practice. We've yet to see a story "run in full" on the main Gawker site: We're getting bigger pictures, as promised, but those are still accompanied by an excerpt (to click through makes your visit count as at least two pageviews) and, sometimes, a list of stories and excerpts that looks remarkably similar to the old Gawker.

gawker2.JPG

They take up more of the page now -- two thirds! -- but we're still just getting a series of excerpts and thumbnail images in, look at that, reverse chronological order. Glynnis MacNicol noticed this same thing, calling attention to it on Business Insider this morning: "After a bumpy rollout yesterday, and the expected howling from regular readers, Gawker appears to have already dialed back on its redesign plan to only feature one big story on the homepage." She updated the post when Denton responded "that post is just an overnight roundup. Look at site during course of day." Well, I did. The screenshot above was taken yesterday afternoon.

Jump to comments
Presented by

Nicholas Jackson is a former associate editor at The Atlantic.

Get Today's Top Stories in Your Inbox (preview)

Why Are Americans So Bad at Saving Money?

The US is particularly miserable at putting aside money for the future. Should we blame our paychecks or our psychology?


Elsewhere on the web

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

The Death of Film

You'll never hear the whirring sound of a projector again.

Video

How to Hunt With Poison Darts

A Borneo hunter explains one of his tribe's oldest customs: the art of the blowpipe

Video

A Delightful, Pixar-Inspired Cartoon

An action figure and his reluctant sidekick trek across a kitchen in search of treasure.

Video

I Am an Undocumented Immigrant

"I look like a typical young American."

Video

Why Did I Study Physics?

Using hand-drawn cartoons to explain an academic passion

Writers

Up
Down

More in Technology

Just In