Microtasking: Don't Blame Henry Ford

More

To its fans, microtasking -- the Web-based division of intellectual work into small units coordinated either by entrepreneurs or within a company -- is a miracle of high-tech efficiency, raising global living standards. To its critics, it's just the latest version of older ills like the assembly-line speedup and the deskilling of early automation, in effect the "digital sweatshop." The New York Times technology columnist Randall Stross presents both sides of this "thin-slicing" here.

Stross concludes:

Worker control is precisely what the Microtask model has engineered out -- that's the source of its insidious efficiency. Just as Ford's assembly lines a century ago brought work to workers who performed a single, repetitive task, Microtask's software, via the Internet, does the same.

Every two seconds.

But this statement misses an essential point about Henry Ford, especially before his battles with the United Auto Workers in the 1930s. While Ford's system was indeed based on an extensive division of labor, it also depended on a stable, high-quality work force concentrated on as much as possible in one giant complex. Ford's Five-Dollar Day, announced in 1914, doubled the going wage rate for most workers. Other industrialists condemned it; the radical writer John Reed, who only a few years later would have a hero's burial in the Kremlin Wall cemetery, praised Ford as "a powerful industrial baron who is interested in human beings instead of stocks and bonds."

Of course discouraging unionization was important to Ford, as was reducing turnover, but his strategy was the opposite of contracting with a dispersed network of small shops competing with low bids. Larry Summers, among other economists, believes Ford's system worked as planned. Where are the microtasking Web entrepreneurs who have found a way to double the wages of white collar workers? I'd love to read a column about them.

Jump to comments
Presented by

Edward Tenner is a historian of technology and culture. He was a founding advisor of Smithsonian's Lemelson Center and holds a Ph.D in European history. More

Edward Tenner is an independent writer and speaker on the history of technology and the unintended consequences of innovation. He holds a Ph.D. in European history from the University of Chicago and was executive editor for physical science and history at Princeton University Press. A former member of the Harvard Society of Fellows and John Simon Guggenheim fellow, he has been a visiting lecturer at Princeton and has held visiting research positions at the Institute for Advanced Study, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, and the Princeton Center for Information Technology Policy. He is now an affiliate of the Center for Arts and Cultural Policy of Princeton's Woodrow Wilson School. He was a founding advisor of Smithsonian's Lemelson Center, where he remains a senior research associate.

Get Today's Top Stories in Your Inbox (preview)

Saving Central: One High School's Struggle After Resegregation

Meet the students and staff at Tuscaloosa’s all-black Central High School in a short documentary film by Maisie Crow. 


Elsewhere on the web

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

Where Time Comes From

The clocks that coordinate your cellphone, GPS, and more

Video

Computer Vision Syndrome and You

Save your eyes. Take breaks.

Video

What Happens in 60 Seconds

Quantifying human activity around the world

Writers

Up
Down

More in Technology

From This Author

Just In